Skip to content

NBA Accreditation Management

Programme accreditation built on evidence you already generate.

NBA accreditation is programme-specific and outcome-centred. HEIM brings together attainment from the OBE module, faculty and student data from HEIMS and improvement records from the department into one structured SAR workspace per programme.

heim.institution.edu.in/nba/btech-ece

B.Tech Electronics & Communication · CAY 2025–26

Self-Assessment Report workspace

2 in review

SAR criteria

Auto-populated tables
  • 1Vision, Mission & PEOs
  • 2Programme Curriculum & Teaching-Learning
  • 3Course Outcomes & Programme Outcomes
  • 4Students’ Performance
  • 5Faculty Information & Contributions
  • 6Facilities & Technical Support
  • 7Continuous Improvement

PO attainment (direct + indirect)

Target 2.0
target
123456789101112

Success rate

86%

Without backlog

Student : faculty

17.4

Within norms

Placement + HS

79%

Last 3 batches

Illustrative interface · sample data

Institutional challenges

What institutions tell us.

The recurring obstacles we encounter when institutions approach nba accreditation management.

01

Programme-by-programme effort

Each programme seeking accreditation needs its own SAR, multiplying the documentation workload for departments.

02

Attainment evidence gaps

Attainment calculations, mapping justifications and action-taken reports are often incomplete for earlier academic years.

03

Faculty and student data reconciliation

Cadre ratios, faculty qualifications, student performance and placement figures must be consistent across criteria.

04

Sustaining accreditation

After accreditation, departments must continue documenting improvements to sustain status at re-accreditation.

Our approach

One SAR workspace per programme

Each programme gets a dedicated workspace structured by criteria. Quantitative tables are populated from HEIMS and the OBE module, while narratives, mapping justifications and continuous improvement evidence are authored and reviewed by the department and the institutional accreditation cell.

  • Criterion structure configurable for applicable programme categories and SAR formats
  • Automatic population of student intake, performance, faculty and attainment tables
  • Department and institution-level review workflow before the SAR is finalised

Detailed capabilities

What the platform covers.

Vision, mission & PEOs

Document the process for defining and reviewing vision, mission and programme educational objectives.

Programme curriculum

Curriculum structure, gap identification and content beyond syllabus with supporting records.

Course outcomes & POs

CO statements, CO-PO matrices and attainment computed in the OBE module, pulled in directly.

Student performance

Intake, success rate, academic performance and placement tables generated from student records.

Faculty information

Student-faculty ratio, cadre, qualifications, retention, development activities and contributions.

Facilities & support

Laboratories, equipment, maintenance and safety records linked to the programme.

Continuous improvement

Attainment gaps, actions taken and their measured impact, cycle after cycle.

SAR compilation

Compile approved content into a consistently formatted SAR with an evidence index.

Workflow

SAR preparation workflow

  1. 01

    Select programme

    Create a SAR workspace for the programme and assessment years.

  2. 02

    Populate data

    Tables draw on HEIMS, OBE and examination data automatically.

  3. 03

    Author narratives

    Departments write criterion narratives and attach evidence.

  4. 04

    Internal review

    Accreditation cell reviews completeness and consistency.

  5. 05

    Finalise SAR

    An approved, indexed SAR is compiled for submission.

Institutional benefits

Outcomes that leadership can see.

Less duplicated effort

Shared data populates every programme’s SAR without re-entry.

Stronger outcome evidence

Attainment is traceable from questions to programme outcomes.

Consistency across criteria

Faculty and student figures match wherever they appear.

Sustained accreditation

Improvement records accumulate naturally between visits.

Deployment architecture

Deployed the way your institution requires.

Best deployed with HEIM OBE so that attainment flows directly into the SAR. Departments can be onboarded programme by programme.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

No. It is an independent institutional platform for organising data and evidence. Accreditation processes and decisions are governed solely by NBA.

Begin the conversation

Explore NBA Accreditation Management for your institution.

Schedule a consultation with our institutional team, or request a demonstration configured around your academic structure and priorities.