NAAC Accreditation Management
Be accreditation-ready every year, not only in the year of the visit.
A structured workspace for every criterion, key indicator and metric — with clear ownership, evidence linked to source records and a live readiness view for the IQAC and institutional leadership.
Assessment period 2021–26
Criterion-wise readiness
Criteria
Data · EvidencePending with departments
This week- 3.3.1Due 4 Nov
Research papers per teacher
Physics
- 3.4.2Due 6 Nov
Extension activities
NSS Cell
- 7.1.3Overdue
Green campus initiatives
Estate
- 5.2.1Due 8 Nov
Placement of outgoing students
Placement
Institutional challenges
What institutions tell us.
The recurring obstacles we encounter when institutions approach naac accreditation management.
Five years of evidence at once
Data and documents for the assessment period are often collected retrospectively, when original records are hard to trace.
Unclear metric ownership
Metrics depend on contributions from many departments, but responsibility and deadlines are managed by email and spreadsheets.
Data validation queries
Mismatches between reported figures and supporting documents lead to clarifications during data validation and verification.
Changing frameworks
Assessment methodologies are revised from time to time, and institutions need to adapt templates without restarting their preparation.
Our approach
Criterion-wise readiness, continuously maintained
The NAAC module mirrors the criterion, key indicator and metric structure in a configurable framework. Quantitative metrics draw on HEIMS, research and examination data wherever possible; qualitative metrics are drafted collaboratively with review workflows; every value carries its supporting evidence.
- Framework templates are configurable as NAAC methodologies evolve, preserving historical data
- Year-wise data collection aligns AQAR preparation with eventual SSR requirements
- Readiness dashboards show completion, evidence coverage and pending reviews by criterion and department
Detailed capabilities
What the platform covers.
Criterion workspace
Structured spaces for curricular aspects, teaching-learning and evaluation, research, infrastructure, student support, governance and institutional values.
Metric-wise data collection
Templates for quantitative metrics with field-level validation and auto-calculation of derived values.
Qualitative narratives
Collaborative drafting with word limits, version history, reviewer comments and approval.
Evidence management
Upload, tag and link documents to metrics; detect missing or expired evidence before review.
Department responsibilities
Assign metrics and sub-tasks to departments and individuals with timelines and escalation rules.
SSR documentation
Assemble the Self-Study Report from approved metrics and narratives with consistent formatting.
AQAR alignment
Annual data captured for AQAR becomes the foundation for the multi-year SSR.
Readiness dashboard
Criterion-wise completion, evidence coverage, review status and risk flags for the IQAC and leadership.
Workflow
Readiness workflow
- 01
Configure framework
Criteria, indicators and metrics are set up for the applicable methodology.
- 02
Assign ownership
Each metric is allocated to departments with due dates.
- 03
Capture & attach
Departments enter data and link evidence to each value.
- 04
Review & validate
IQAC reviewers check accuracy and request corrections.
- 05
Compile
Approved content is compiled into SSR-ready documentation.
Institutional benefits
Outcomes that leadership can see.
Reduced last-minute effort
Year-wise capture spreads the workload across the assessment period.
Fewer validation clarifications
Evidence is linked to every value and checked before submission.
Shared accountability
Departments see exactly what they own and when it is due.
Institutional memory
Evidence and narratives are retained for subsequent cycles even as staff change.
Deployment architecture
Deployed the way your institution requires.
Deploy as part of HEIM IQAC, or independently for an upcoming assessment. Data can be imported from existing spreadsheets during onboarding to avoid rework.
Experience
HEIM modules
Intelligence
Data & integration
Infrastructure
Managed cloud
Hosted and operated by Bharat Online
Private cloud
Dedicated tenancy on approved cloud
On-premises
Institution’s own data centre
FAQ
Frequently asked questions
No. Bharat Online Education is an independent technology provider. The platform helps institutions organise their own data and evidence; assessment and accreditation decisions rest solely with NAAC.
Related solutions
Connect further across the institution.
Begin the conversation
Explore NAAC Accreditation Management for your institution.
Schedule a consultation with our institutional team, or request a demonstration configured around your academic structure and priorities.